Monday, June 1, 2020

Application of Motivation Theories to Event Management Industry - II


Herzberg’s two-factor theory

Frederick Herzberg’s two-factor theory revealed that human’s behavior is influenced by two sets of factors which are the satisfaction factor and the dissatisfaction factor (Alshmemri, et al., 2017).

  Figure 1: Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (Zhou, 2017)

Based on the theory, Frederik Herzberg pointed out the two components which contribute to the state of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, called motivator factors and hygiene factors as show in figure 1 (Herzberg, 1987).

Motivator factors, including personal achievement, status, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, growth, promotion, and opportunity for advancement, are described as intrinsic factors (Herzberg, 1987).

Motivator Factors

Presence of motivator factors such as achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement & personal growth will effect to employee motivation and absence of these motivation factors will not subject to employees’ dissatisfaction (Worlu & Chidozie, 2012).

Hygiene Factors

Hygiene factors includes; interpersonal relationships, company policies and administration, working conditions, quality of supervision, job security, salary, wages  and relationship with assistants (Ruthankoon & Ogunlana, 2003). Existence of hygiene will not motivate the employees but can prevent employees’ dissatisfaction. Moreover, when the hygiene factors are not present it will cause employee to become demotivated (Schermerhorn, et al., 2003).

Application of Herzberg’s Two-factor Theory

I have been working for a leading event management organization in Sri Lanka. Currently, there is no HR department or a HR manager in the company and all the HR roles are handled by the management. The management is not having a proper knowledge in HR practices and theories. The event management industry is considered as one of the tough occupations for its employees due to the nature of work. They are long working hours, deadlines, and unforeseen situations. My co-workers and colleagues are struggling to fulfill their basic needs due to insufficient income even though most of them are executive level employees. In addition to this, the company has neglected the significant of arranging hygiene factors within the organization and it has badly affected on employee motivation.

Following factors are not currently exist in the company and I would propose some suggestions to eliminate job dissatisfaction.

1. No proper salary increment system

In the company, the management has not carried out proper salary increment system. Some employees are given salary increment for improper time periods. The percentage also differ from employee to employee and this is not based on their seniority or performance.

Suggestion – Management should introduce proper increment system which should be transparent and fair for all departments.

2. No Employee Appraisal system

Even though the employee appraisal system is considered as one of the most important process for all organization, the company has not implemented it for last 8 years. Employees are not getting any opportunity to discuss about their achievements, problems, limitations with the management. Due to this situation, employee are dissatisfied with their jobs and they have less concern on improving of their work. In fact the employees are not interested on giving new ideas and innovations since the management does not appreciate or value the employees’ commitments on a regular basis.

Suggestion - The management should consult a third party resource and acquire the knowledge on how to carry out proper employee appraisal system. This will be helpful to develop employee’s engagement in their jobs. If the employees perceive that their hard work and new ideas are appreciated and valued by the management, they will start delivering their fullest contribution towards achieving the organization goals.

3. Lack of knowledge in HR management

The company is a service organization and it completely depends on human resources. Since the management is not having an appropriate understanding in HR management, many employees are facing lot of issues with their jobs. Some employees work over two to three weeks continuously with long hours but still the management does not consider on giving day off  of any reimbursement according to HR practices.

Suggestion – If the management is unable to form a separate HR department due to the cost factor and the scale of the organization. The company can appoint new employee who is qualified and experience in HR management. Furthermore the top management can attend seminars and workshops in human resource management. That will be the best way to solve HR problems in the company.

4. No incentive or reward system on employees’ achievements

The company’s main income sources are space hiring and sponsorship which is performed by the sales team. Management has given sales target for each events but when the employees reach their targets they won’t receive any incentives, commissions and rewards. This lead employees towards demotivation and certain employees may not give their maximum inputs. For the last few years, some events income is stagnated or growing rate has noticeably gone down.

Suggestion – Management can introduce a proper incentive and rewards system which should be based on the employees’ performance. This will definitely help to enhance the hygiene factors in the company.

When the company implements above system properly, hygiene factors will be enhanced and it will prevent employees from dissatisfaction. Further, existence of hygiene factors will not make employees motivated but will avoid dissatisfaction and at the same time that will be the beginning point of the motivation. However, motivation can be not created by improving this hygiene conditions (Huling, 2003).

 

References

 

Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. & Maude, P., 2017. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), pp. 12-16.

Herzberg, F., 1987. One more time: How do you motivate employees?. The United States of America: Harvard Business Review .

Huling, E., 2003. Rough Notes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(1), pp. 17-24.

Ruthankoon, R. & Ogunlana, S. O., 2003. Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory in the Thai Construction Industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural, 10(5), pp. 333-342.

Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G. & Osborn, R. N., 2003. Organizational Behavior. 8th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.

Worlu, R. E. K. & Chidozie, F., 2012. The Validity of Herzberg’s Dual-Factor Theory on Job Satisfaction of Political Marketers. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 6(1), pp. 39-50.

Zhou, Z., 2017. HARPER ZHOU'S BLOG. [Online] Available at: https://blogs.ubc.ca/comm292ziqingzhou/2017/04/02/64/ [Accessed 28 May 2020].

 

 

 







3 comments:

  1. Interested Supun. Additionally, motivation is the key factor to get peoples engagement to their works. Within any field it is a unique aspect and it can’t avoid within any job category. To people get engaged with any activity that assign by the company, to do it easily, motivation would be the main key factor. Because context of the motivation and job engagement is behave together within every organization (Evans 1998).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agree with your views. Organizational structures commonly consist with rewards systems as an employee motivational factor with the intention of improvement in performance levels. On the other hand, lack of motivation will result negatively result in both employee and organizational performance (Sutikno, 2019). According to research findings by Jamil and Raja (2011), increase in salary/wages and compensations (rewards) has a significant positive impact on employee’s performance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It’s evident that the balance between hygiene and motivation factors reflect the optimal level of motivation in an organization. But which element the organization should give prominence differ on the type of the organization and the internal situation (Dartey-Baah & Amoako, 2011).

    ReplyDelete